Cody Taylor

stoolpigeon writes “Google has announced the now public beta for the Google Analytics API (described here). The API lets developers create client applications that can pull analytics data, to mash it up with other data or to present it in new ways. The API has been available through a private beta program for about a year, and some applications are already out there: examples include Polaris on Adobe Air and Analytics for Android.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

NewYorkCountryLawyer writes “The procedures used by the RIAA the past 5 years in suing ‘John Does’ without their knowing about it have never been subjected to scrutiny by an appeals court, since most of the ‘John Does’ never learn about the ‘ex parte’ proceeding until it’s too late to do anything about it. That is about to change. In Arista Records v. Does 1-16, a case targeting students at the Albany Campus of the State University of New York, the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has decided to put things on hold while it takes a careful look at what transpired in the lower court. The way it came to this is that a few ‘John Does’ filed a broad-based challenge to a number of the RIAA’s procedures, citing the defendant’s constitutional rights, the insufficiency of the complaint, the lack of personal jurisdiction over the defendants, improper misjoinder of the defendants, and the RIAA’s illegal procurement of its ‘evidence’ through the use of an unlicensed investigator, MediaSentry. The lower court judges gave short shrift to ‘John Doe #3,’ but he promptly filed an appeal, and asked for a stay of the subpoena and lower court proceedings during the pendency of the appeal. The RIAA opposed the motion, arguing that John Doe’s appeal had no chance of success. The Appeals Court disagreed and granted the motion, freezing the subpoena and putting the entire case on hold until the appeal is finally determined. As one commentator said, ‘this news has been a long time coming, but is welcomed.'”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Shortly before 2 p.m. PDT (1:52 p.m.), the iTunes App Store hit 1,000,000,000 apps sold since it originally just nine months ago. It’s by no means perfect, but it’s still a significant milestone for the store, the iPhone (and iPod Touch) and Apple.

Matt Mason (The Pirate’s Dilemma) has some wise words on why the Spectrial’s not doing anybody any favours

An anonymous reader writes in with an opinion piece from ZDNet Australia. “Here’s what the official press release won’t tell you about Ubuntu 9.04, which formally hit the streets yesterday: its designers have polished the hell out of its user interface since the last release in October. Just like Microsoft has taken the blowtorch to Vista to produce the lightning-quick Windows 7, which so far runs well even on older hardware, Ubuntu has picked up its own game.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

An anonymous reader sends us to Popular Science for a long article on the loose, uncoordinated bands of patriotic Chinese hackers that seem to be responsible for much of the cyber-trouble emerging from that nation. QUoting: “For years, the U.S. intelligence community worried that China’s government was attacking our cyber-infrastructure. Now one man has discovered it’s more than that: it’s hundreds of thousands of everyday Chinese civilians. … Jack Linchuan Qiu, a communications professor at the Chinese University of Hong Kong [says:] ‘Chinese hackerism is not the American “hacktivism” that wants social change. It’s actually very close to the state. The Chinese distinction between the private and public domains is very small.’ … According to [James Andrew Lewis, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies], ‘The government at a minimum tolerates them. Sometimes it encourages them. And sometimes it tasks them and controls them.’ In the end, he says, ‘it’s easy for the government to turn on and hard to turn off.'”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Hugh Pickens writes “Can a noncommercial website use the trademark of the entity it critiques in its domain name? Surprisingly, it appears that the usually open-minded folks at Wikipedia think not. The EFF reports that Scott Kildall and Nathaniel Stern have created a noncommercial website at Wikipediaart.org intended to comment on the nature of art and Wikipedia. Since ‘Wikipedia’ is a trademark owned by the Wikimedia Foundation, the Foundation has demanded that the artists give up the domain name peaceably or it will attempt to take it by legal force. ‘Wikipedia should know better. There is no trademark or cybersquatting issue here,’ writes the EFF’s Corynne McSherry. ‘Moreover, even if US trademark laws somehow reached this noncommercial activity, the artists’ use of the mark is an obvious fair use.’ iI is hard to see what Wikipedia gains by litigating this matter but easy to see how they lose.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.