Cody Taylor

An anonymous reader writes “The Indian Supreme Court has ruled that bloggers cannot shelter under an escape clause such as ‘Any views expressed are solely those of the writers’ to exercise freedom of speech in discussions and statements online. The ruling comes in response to an anti-defamation case filed against a 19 year old student’s Orkut community, commenting upon the right-wing political organization Shiv Sena. This organization is based in the western state of Maharashtra and has been responsible for inflammatory speeches and numerous attacks upon non-Maharashtrians.” The article does not make it entirely clear whether the student owner is himself accused of defamatory speech, or only commenters posting on his site. His defense that an Orkut community is not equivalent to a public forum was denied.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

CWmike writes “Red Hat used to be in the desktop business along with all the other Linux distributors. Then, they left. Now, however, Red Hat is switching from Xen to KVM for virtualization. As part of that switchover, Red Hat will be using not only KVM, but the SolidICE/SPICE desktop virtualization and management software suite to introduce a new server-based desktop virtualization system. Does this mean that Red Hat will be getting back into the Linux desktop business? That’s the question I posed to Red Hat CTO Brian Stevens, in a phone call after the Red Hat/KVM press conference, and he told me that, ‘Yes. Red Hat will indeed be pushing the Linux desktop again.'”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Glyn Moody writes “The February 2009 Netcraft survey is not the usual ‘Apache continues to trounce Microsoft IIS’ story: there’s a new entrant — from China. ‘This majority of this month’s growth is down to the appearance of 20 million Chinese sites served by QZHTTP. This web server is used by QQ to serve millions of Qzone sites beneath the qq.com domain.’ What exactly is this QZHTTP, and what does it all mean for the world of Web servers?”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

christian.einfeldt writes “According to an article in Laptop Magazine on-line, one-third of Dell Inspiron Mini 9s netbooks are sold with the Ubuntu Linux operating system. Dell senior product manager John New attributed the sales volume to the lower price point of the Ubuntu Linux machines. And the return rate of the Ubuntu Linux machines is approximately equal to that of comparable netbooks sold with Microsoft Windows XP. Dell spokesperson Jay Pinkert attriutes the low return rate to Dell’s good communications with its customers, saying ‘We have done a very good job explaining to folks what Linux is.'”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

An anonymous reader writes “I’ve got an Eee PC 1000HD, and frankly, I can’t stand XP. I know it’s odd, because I actually like Vista, but XP is such a giant piece of crap on here that I struggle to use it day-by-day. Anyway, my question is this: which Linux distro should I run on it? Plain Ubuntu just doesn’t have driver support. I tried Ubuntu-eee, which, to put it bluntly, does not work for me at all (slow, terrible battery life, even worse interface). I’ve heard that Jaunty Jackalope is going to have better netbook support, but that’s all the way in April! Is there a distro out now that will free me from XP’s terribleness without being terrible itself?” Getting wireless working on an Eee PC (though in my experience imperfectly) with stock Ubuntu is possible; for me it took some googling, though I’ve been told with great enthusiasm that it actually works “out of the box.” What distros are you running on your netbook, and what problems do you find?

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

pmbasehore writes “While waiting for his cruise ship to depart, a man decided to use his AT&T wireless card and Slingbox account to watch the Bears vs. Lions football game. When he got his bill, he was slammed with ,067.31 in ‘International Roaming’ charges, even though he never left American soil. The bill was finally dropped to 0.65, but only after the media got involved.” He might have left the soil (the story says he was already aboard the ship), but shouldn’t the dock count?

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

CNETNate writes “Apple has released the beta version of Safari 4 for Mac and PC, with claims that its Nitro rendering engine is ’30 times faster than IE7,’ and three times faster than Firefox 3. Other new features include ‘Top Sites,’ which shows users the most frequently visited Web pages, ‘Full History Search’ for searching through not only the URLs and titles of visited pages, but also the complete text within the page itself — something Opera has been doing for a while.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Many readers noted an outage affecting Google’s gmail service last night. Firmafest points to a statement from Google, according to which only a small subset of users were affected. According to reader CaptHarlock, mail itself remained accessible through IMAP clients, and the chat feature via external applications. jw3 asks “Of course, gmail is just one of the many providers of web-based e-mails. When I look around, almost everyone seems to be using them nowadays. So — what do you do? Do you trust that the site of your web-based e-mail provider will never go down? Do you make backups of all your e-mails?” (Some readers still seem to be unable to reach the site, too.)

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

jw3 writes “The NASA Orbiting Carbon Observatory scheduled for launch today has failed its mission: the payload fairing failed to separate and the launch managers declared a contingency. George Diller, NASA launch commentator, said, ‘It either did not separate or did not separate in the way that it should, but at any rate we’re still trying to evaluate exactly what the status of the spacecraft is at this point.'” Update: 02/24 14:17 GMT by T : Reader fadethepolice points out a Reuters report which says that the craft crashed into the ocean just short of Antarctica.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

afabbro writes “The US Supreme Court rejected the FTC’s bid to impose anti-trust penalties on Rambus. Without comment, they let stand an appeals court decision favoring Rambus. The FTC had found that Rambus undermined competition by getting secretly patented technology included in industry standards, but the Supremes evidently didn’t agree.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.