Cody Taylor

Inspired by Seinfeld, DefectiveByDesign is “impeaching” Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos, asking him to drop DRM on the Kindle.

Mike writes “If you buy a Kindle and some Kindle ebooks from Amazon, be careful of returning items. Amazon decided that one person had returned too many things, so they suspended his Amazon account, which meant that he could no longer buy any Kindle books, and any Kindle subscriptions he’s paid for stop working. After some phone calls, Amazon granted him a one-time exception and reactivated his account again.” Take this with as much salt as you’d like.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Thanks to Amazon.com’s Kindle, the e-book reader has gone from a niche curiosity to a mainstream, oft-cited technology in a little more than a year. But now buzz is snapping and crackling about a second wave of electronic readers coming down the pike to give Amazon a run for its undisclosed monies.

Amazon’s Kindle 2 is slimmer, faster and has longer battery life than its predecessor. But the newly launched e-book reader falls short when it comes to how well it displays text, say some users.

I Don’t Believe in Imaginary Property writes “Discovery Communications, the parent company of the Discovery Channel, is alleging that Amazon’s Kindle e-book reader infringes upon their patent for DRM-encumbered e-books (Discovery’s complaint, PDF). The patent in question was filed back in 1999 and issued in 2007 — coincidentally one day after Kindle 1.0 went on the market — and has claims for DRM implemented with a great many particular symmetric key ciphers and key exchange algorithms, (the patent has 171 claims). Unlike most software patents, this one goes into quite a lot of detail about how the encryption is to be performed. But it will still be interesting to see if it can pass the ‘machine or transformation’ test now that In Re Bilski is being accepted as precedent. After all, it seems like all of these encryption and e-book distribution schemes could be run on a general-purpose PC, so is the ‘invention’ actually tied to a ‘particular machine or apparatus’ just because an e-book ‘viewer’ (not to mention ‘home system’, ‘library’, and ‘kiosk’) happens to be specified in the patent’s claims? Or can the encryption of an e-book be claimed as some kind of ‘transformation’ when the law in that area is especially murky — when no one knows how In Re Bilski may affect the precedent of In Re Schrader?”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Amazon recently threatened the smackdown on a site offering instructions on how to trick the Kindle into reading other types of files. This isn’t a question of copyright infringement, it’s a question of control.

InlawBiker writes “Today, Amazon invoked the DMCA to force removal of a python script and instructions from the mobileread web site. The script is used to identify the Kindle’s internal ID number, which can be used to enable non-Amazon purchased books to work on the Kindle. ‘…this week we received a DMCA take-down notice from Amazon requesting the removal of the tool kindlepid.py and instructions for it. Although we never hosted this tool (contrary to their claim), nor believe that this tool is used to remove technological measures (contrary to their claim), we decided, due to the vagueness of the DMCA law and our intention to remain in good relation with Amazon, to voluntarily follow their request and remove links and detailed instructions related to it.’ Ironically, the purpose of the script is to make the Kindle more useful to its users.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

InlawBiker writes “Today, Amazon invoked the DMCA to force removal of a python script and instructions from the mobileread web site. The script is used to identify the Kindle’s internal ID number, which can be used to enable non-Amazon purchased books to work on the Kindle. ‘…this week we received a DMCA take-down notice from Amazon requesting the removal of the tool kindlepid.py and instructions for it. Although we never hosted this tool (contrary to their claim), nor believe that this tool is used to remove technological measures (contrary to their claim), we decided, due to the vagueness of the DMCA law and our intention to remain in good relation with Amazon, to voluntarily follow their request and remove links and detailed instructions related to it.’ Ironically, the purpose of the script is to make the Kindle more useful to its users.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

First the bad news: In multiple ways, Amazon’s new Kindle reader for the iPhone falls short of being the ultimate iPhone e-book application. It fails to replicate all the major features of a 9 Kindle device. But despite that, it’s a delight to have Kindle on the iPhone. What makes Kindle Kindle isn’t software but content –244,000 books’ worth.

palmsolo writes “The Amazon Kindle 2 just started shipping last week, but Amazon surprised everyone late on March 3rd by placing the Amazon Kindle software for the iPhone in the Apple App Store. With the Whispersync technology you can now keep your Kindle and iPhone ebooks in sync and read everywhere you go. Readers on the iPhone also now get access to over 200,000 ebook titles on the Amazon Kindle storefront. Check out the hands-on image gallery and video of the Amazon Kindle software on the iPhone and Kindle 2.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.