Cody Taylor

January 28 is International Data Privacy Day 2009. As part of the event, Intel has posted a list of online privacy tips for teenagers. But adults are the ones who really need the advice — as news story after news story proves.

How much private information is available about you in cyberspace? Social Security numbers are just the beginning. She had me at hello … or just about. Our conversation had barely started when privacy activist Betty Ostergren interrupted me to say that she had found my full name, address, Social Security number and a digital image of my signature

Howardd21 writes “PC World reports that Mozilla Labs wants 1% of its Firefox users to voluntarily provide information about how they use the browser, and their web browsing habits. This would be done through an add-on named “Test Pilot” that collects the information and associates it with some demographic information that the user has provided. Unlike other data collection utilities that software developers may include to provide usage information, the add-on will follow the same open source concept that Firefox adheres to, allowing the market to better understand what is being collected. Mozilla Labs stresses privacy when discussing how they will collect, store and use the data, including publishing it for other researchers to to analyze.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

J ROC writes “Phone numbers on Canada’s Do-Not-Call registry have apparently been sold to off-shore telemarketers, scam artists, and other ne’er-do-wells, according to reports in the Globe & Mail and CBC News. The CRTC, which runs the registry, sells lists of phone numbers online for a small fee; making it available to anybody who might be interested in buying it, including con artists. I guess this explains why, ever since I added my number to the registry, I’ve been getting phone calls from 000-000-0000 trying to interest me in some free vacation scam. Canada’s Privacy Commissioner is currently investigating.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

An anonymous reader writes “The new White House website privacy policy promises that the site will not use long-term tracking cookies, complying with a decade old rule prohibiting such user tracking by federal agencies. However, Obama’s legal team has quietly exempted YouTube from this rule. Visitors to the official White House blog will receive long-term tracking cookies whenever they surf to a web-page with an embedded YouTube video — even those users that do not click the “play” button. As CNET reports, no other company has been singled out and rewarded with such a waiver.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

twitter writes “Four years after Steve Ballmer vowed to kill Google, Wired details Microsoft’s, AT&T’s, and big publishers’ ongoing slog. The story is filled with astroturfers, lobbyists and others spending millions to manufacture FUD about privacy and monopoly in order to protect the obsolete business models of their patrons, who are mostly known for progress-halting monopoly and invasion of privacy. Their greatest coup to date was preventing Google from rescuing Yahoo.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

CurtMonash writes “The New York Times reports on President-Elect Obama’s continued commitment to electronic health records (EHRs), which on the whole are a great idea. The article cites a number of legislative initiatives to deal with the privacy risks of EHRs. That’s where things start to go astray. The proposals seem to focus on simply controlling the flow of information, but from a defense-in-depth standpoint, that’s not enough. Medical care is full of information waivers, much like EULAs, only with your health at stake. What’s more, any information control regime has to have exceptions for medical emergencies — but where legitimate emergencies are routine, socially-engineered fake emergencies can blast security to smithereens. So medical information privacy will never be adequate unless there are strong usage-control rules as well, in areas such as discrimination, marketing, or tabloid-press publication. I’ve provided some ideas as to how and why that could work well.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

StupidPeopleTrick writes “After the executive order signed in 2006, states are making strides with privacy breach notification but are struggling with enacting privacy laws and finding funding. With looming deadlines to move to e-records and e-prescribing, where will the money and the privacy standards come from?”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.