Cody Taylor

Village Idiot sends word of a patent granted to MIT researchers for a cone of silence a la Maxwell Smart. This one doesn’t use plastic, but rather active and networked sensors and speakers embedded in a (probably indoor) space such as an open-plan office. “In “Get Smart” secret agents wanting a private conversation would deploy the ‘cone of silence,’ a clear plastic contraption lowered over the agents’ heads. It never worked — they couldn’t hear each other, while eavesdroppers could pick up every word. Now a modern cone of silence that we are assured will work is being patented by engineers Joe Paradiso and Yasuhiro Ono of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. … Instead of plastic domes, they use a sensor network to work out where potential eavesdroppers are, and speakers to generate a subtle masking sound at just the right level. … The array of speakers… aims a mix of white noise and randomized office hubbub at the eavesdroppers. The subtle, confusing sound makes the conversation unintelligible.” One comment thread on the article wonders about the propriety of tracking people around an office in order to preserve privacy.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Cloud computing is a hot topic in the technology world these days. Even if you’re not a tech-phile, chances are if you’ve watched a lot of television or skimmed a business magazine, you’ve heard someone talking about cloud computing as the way of the future. While it’s difficult to predict the future.

An anonymous reader writes with a report about programs revealed in the Department of Justice’s 2010 budget request, which includes 3.9 million in funding for an “Advanced Electronic Surveillance” project, and .6 million to establish the Biometric Technology Center. The surveillance project is designed to help the FBI “deal with changing technology and ways to intercept phone calls such as those used by VOIP phones or technology such as Skype. The program is also conducting research on ways to conduct automated analysis to look for links between subjects of surveillance and other investigative suspects.” The Center for Democracy and Technology’s Jim Dempsey warns, “It is appropriate for the FBI to develop more and more powerful interception tools, but the privacy laws that are supposed to guide and limit the use of those tools have not kept pace.” The biometrics plan lays groundwork for a “vast database of personal data including fingerprints, iris scans and DNA which the FBI calls the Next Generation Identification,” a system we have discussed in the past.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Twice this week, I’ve engaged in conversations about Apple missing the boat on potentially sweet markets that would have fit right into its iTunes growth strategy. Amazon’s Kindle-DX and the announcement by Real Networks CEO Rob Glaser of a forthcoming product, code-named Facet. Real’s DVD-ripping technology is should be available in iTunes.

storagedude writes “The WSJ has a cool article on how the race to digitize literary treasures has led to a trove of new discoveries. Quoting: ‘Improved technology is allowing researchers to scan ancient texts that were once unreadable — blackened in fires or by chemical erosion, painted over or simply too fragile to unroll. Now, scholars are studying these works with X-ray fluorescence, multispectral imaging used by NASA to photograph Mars and CAT scans used by medical technicians … By taking high-resolution digital images in 14 different light wavelengths, ranging from infrared to ultraviolet, Oxford scholars are reading bits of papyrus that were discovered in 1898 in an ancient garbage dump in central Egypt. So far, researchers have digitized about 80% of the collection of 500,000 fragments, dating from the 2nd century B.C. to the 8th century A.D. The texts include fragments of unknown works by famous authors of antiquity, lost gospels and early Islamic manuscripts.'”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Anonymous Entrepreneur writes “I run a small technology startup company; so small that our offices are still located in a room in my home. We are just some young friends, fresh from college, and we haven’t started having regular sales, as 99% of our time is invested in development. A large corporation has just approached us, trying to persuade us to sell our company. The money is fair enough, and the employment conditions would seem excellent, since they would enable us to manage good-sized motivated teams, but we are very emotionally attached to our development and we place great importance to being independent. We founded our company because we didn’t want to follow rules. We wanted to be the ones who make the rules instead. Money really doesn’t mean much to us as long as we can do whatever we want while excelling at our passions. We feel that by accepting the offer, we couldn’t achieve the maximum of our potential, and one of us joked that if we get in contact with the corporate environment and accept their money, we risk becoming lazy. Another member is more pragmatic, saying that accepting some money now is better than waiting for the development to go gold, even though all of us agree that if we finished our thing, we’d earn more than what the corporation has offered us. We would be very interested to know your thoughts and viewpoints, especially if you have ever faced a similar dilemma.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

A new report by the NPD Group indicates that Blu-ray video technology has moved “further into the mainstream.” Indeed, first quarter (Q1) sales of stand-alone Blu-ray players in the US increased by 72 percent to over 400,000 units.

clang_jangle writes “Arstechnica has a short article up describing how Microsoft and Intel have ‘goofed up’ Windows 7’s XP Mode, by ensuring many PCs will not be able to use it. (And it won’t be easy to figure out in advance if your PC is one of them.) Meanwhile, over at Infoworld, Redmond is criticized for having the ‘right idea, wrong technology’ with their latest compatibility scheme, and PC World says ‘great idea, on paper.’ With Windows 7 due to be released in 2010, and Redmond apparently eager to move on from XP, perhaps this is not really a ‘goof’ at all?”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

An anonymous reader writes “From The Washington Post’s Security Fix blog comes a tale that should make any Windows home user or system admin cringe. It seems the latest version of the Zeus Trojan ships with a command that will tell all infected systems to self-destruct. From the piece: ‘Most security experts will tell you that while this so-called “nuclear option” is an available feature in some malware, it is hardly ever used. Disabling infected systems is counterproductive for attackers, who generally focus on hoovering as much personal and financial data as they can from the PCs they control. But try telling that to Roman Hüssy, a 21-year-old Swiss information technology expert, who last month witnessed a collection of more than 100,000 hacked Microsoft Windows systems tearing themselves apart at the command of their cyber criminal overlords.'”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

The software giant’s long-held and deeply rooted enmity toward open-source software appears to be crumbling, if its new Kumo search technology is any indication. In other words, open-source software appears to be the default choice for the Kumo team, not proprietary software. It looks like Microsoft’s anti-open-source bubble really has burst.