Cody Taylor

clickclickdrone writes “The BBC are reporting that Amazon has said it will not allow online advertising system Phorm to scan its web pages to produce targeted ads. For most people this is a welcome step, especially after the European Commission said it was starting legal action against the UK earlier this week over its data protection laws in relation to Phorm’s technology. Anyone who values their privacy should applaud this move by Amazon.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

blackbearnh writes “Yahoo! has been working for a while to promote a unified system for referring to places, through their Where On Earth IDs. Using a WOEID, you can query Yahoo’s publicly available APIs to find out things like what cities are in a county, or what counties border each other. In an interview for O’Reilly Radar, Tyler Bell, the product lead for the Yahoo Geo Technology Group, talks about their Open Location program (not to be confused with openlocation.org, a different group altogether.) He also talks about how privacy concerns interact with the increasing use of personal geotracking, and the troublesome problem of what to call places. ‘I’m not even going to tell you about the problems we had when we accidentally called Constantinople Byzantium, just slipping back about 800 years there accidentally. That’s a very sensitive issue. Any company dealing with geography is going to have to address it somehow. So I’ll be very candid in how Yahoo addresses this. I mean first, our stated goal is to capture the world’s geography as it is used by the world’s people. We don’t see ourselves as the definitive authority on how a place should be called.'”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Afforess writes “‘Proxy servers are an everyday part of Internet surfing. But using one in a crime could soon lead to more time in the clink,’ reports the Associated Press. The new federal rules would make the use of proxy servers count as ‘sophistication’ in a crime, leading to 25% longer jail sentences. Privacy advocates complain this will disincentivize privacy and anonymity online. ‘[The government is telling people] … if you take normal steps to protect your privacy, we’re going to view you as a more sophisticated criminal,’ writes the Center for Democracy and Technology. Others fear this may lead to ‘cruel and unusual punishments’ as Internet and cell phone providers often use proxies without users’ knowledge to reroute Internet traffic. This may also ultimately harm corporations when employees abuse VPN’s, as they too are counted as a ‘proxy’ in the new legislation. TOR, a common Internet anonymizer, is also targeted in the new legislation. Some analysts believe this legislation is an effort to stop leaked US Government information from reaching outside sources, such as Wikileaks. The legislation (PDF, the proposed amendment is on pages 5-15) will be voted on by the United States Sentencing Commission on April 15, and is set to take effect on November 1st. The EFF has already urged the Commission to reject the amendment.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

MJackson writes “The European Commission has opened an infringement proceeding against the UK after a series of complaints by Internet users, and extensive communication with UK authorities, about the use of Phorm’s behavioural advertising system, which uses Deep Packet Inspection (DPI) technology, by internet service providers. Phorm works with UK ISPs to monitor what websites you visit for use in targeted advertising campaigns, though its methods have raised more than a few fears about invasions of privacy. Similar services in the USA have caused an equal level of controversy.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

esocid writes “Back in 2005, the MPAA hired Robert Anderson, a former associate of TorrentSpy’s owner, to illegally obtain internal emails and trade secrets. He did so by routing the email from the internal server to his own Gmail account. He subsequently sold 34 pages of stolen information for ,000 to the MPAA. TorrentSpy owner Justin Bunnel sued them for spying, but lost the case due to a ruling that stated it was not illegal since the information was not intercepted under the Wiretap Act. The EFF called this decision a ‘dangerous attempt to circumvent privacy laws,’ since it implies that the unauthorized interception of anyone’s personal email is legal. The appeal could have ramifications for MPAA president Dan Glickman, as the decision is expected around the time of his contract renewal.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Jamie noticed the news that Google Update is now Open Source. The article acknowledges the privacy and security concerns of an application that is always running in the background of your machine, and authorized to install new software. And Google made the logically obvious conclusion that releasing the source code would alleviate those concerns.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

blackbearnh writes “Jeff Holden spent a decade at Amazon, where he was involved as Senior Vice President of Consumer Websites with the recommendation engine, Amazon Prime, and the product review system. He’s left now, and has started Pelago, a company that wants to help mobile users turn their lives into stories they can share on the web. Among the interesting effects he discusses in this interview for O’Reilly Radar is that users of their product, Whrrl, have talked about changing their lives to make more interesting stories. Holden also talks about some of the work he did at Amazon, privacy issues that arise when social networking starts to become ubiquitous, and why he thinks the Apple App Store review system is seriously broken. ‘One of the things that happens with an iPhone is when you uninstall an app, it asks you to rate it. And it defaults to one-star. … The problem is … there’s no kind of qualification. Anybody just downloads it and checks it out or doesn’t check it out, right? And I think a number of people run it and they see that you have to sign in and they just delete it. And you get a one-star rating out of those experiences.'”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

pinguin-geek writes “Researchers at the McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science at Northwestern University have identified a new “guilt-by-association” threat to privacy in peer-to-peer (P2P) systems that would enable an eavesdropper to accurately classify groups of users with similar download behavior. While many have pointed out that the data exchanged over these connections can reveal personal information about users, the researchers shows that only the patterns of connections — not the data itself — is sufficient to create a powerful threat to user privacy. To thwart this threat, they have released SwarmScreen, a publicly available, open source software that restores privacy by masking a user’s real download activity in such a manner as to disrupt classification.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.