Cody Taylor

CWmike writes “Despite its complexity, the software development process has gotten better over the years. “Mature” programmers remember manual intervention and hand-tuning. Today’s dev tools automatically perform complex functions that once had to be written explicitly. And most developers are glad of it. Yet, young whippersnappers may not even be aware that we old fogies had to do these things manually. Esther Schindler asked several longtime developers for their top old-school programming headaches and added many of her own to boot. Working with punch cards? Hungarian notation?”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

The latest version of Ubuntu includes some nifty embellishments to the GNU Screen program. These improvements make some of Screen’s more sophisticated features accessible to users and simplify

theodp writes “As GE, Google, Intel, IBM, Microsoft and others pile into the business of computerized medical files in a stimulus-fueled frenzy, BusinessWeek reminds us that electronic health records have a dubious history. Under the federal stimulus program, hospitals can get several million dollars apiece for tech purchases over the next five years, and individual doctors can receive up to ,000. There’s also a stick: The feds will cut Medicare reimbursement for hospitals and practices that don’t go electronic by 2015. But does the high cost and questionable quality of products currently on the market explain why barely 1 in 50 hospitals have a comprehensive electronic records system, and why only 17% of physicians use any type of electronic records? Joe Bugajski’s chilling The Data Model That Nearly Killed Me suggests that may be the case.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

narramissic writes “A Dutch university has received a .3 million grant from the European Research Council to fund 5 more years of work on a Unix-type operating system, called Minix, that aims to be more reliable and secure than either Linux or Windows. The latest grant will enable the three researchers and two programmers on the project to further their research into a making Minix capable of fixing itself when a bug is detected, said Andrew S. Tanenbaum, a computer science professor at Vrije Universiteit. ‘It irritates me to no end when software doesn’t work,’ Tanenbaum said. ‘Having to reboot your computer is just a pain. The question is, can you make a system that actually works very well?'”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Omegle.com connects its users with random, anonymous strangers for a private, real-time chat. The site, which started last month, was developed by Leif K-Brooks, an 18-year-old amateur Web programmer and high school student in Vermont who was worried that people’s Web interactions had “become stagnant.”

BillyG noted an RMS interview where he says “‘Software as a service’ means that you think of a particular server as doing your computing for you. If that’s what the server does, you must not use it! If you do your computing on someone else’s server, you hand over control of your computing to whoever controls the server. It is like running binary-only software, only worse: it’s even harder for you to patch the program that’s running on someone else’s server than it is to patch a binary copy of a program running on your own computer. Just like non-free software, ‘software as a service’ is incompatible with your freedom.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

If the program designed by I.B.M. can beat human contestants, the field of artificial intelligence will have made a leap forward.

longacre writes “I.B.M. plans to announce Monday that it is in the final stages of completing a computer program to compete against human ‘Jeopardy!’ contestants. If the program beats the humans, the field of artificial intelligence will have made a leap forward. … The team is aiming not at a true thinking machine but at a new class of software that can ‘understand’ human questions and respond to them correctly. Such a program would have enormous economic implications. … The proposed contest is an effort by I.B.M. to prove that its researchers can make significant technical progress by picking “grand challenges” like its early chess foray. The new bid is based on three years of work by a team that has grown to 20 experts in fields like natural language processing, machine learning and information retrieval. … Under the rules of the match that the company has negotiated with the ‘Jeopardy!’ producers, the computer will not have to emulate all human qualities. It will receive questions as electronic text. The human contestants will both see the text of each question and hear it spoken by the show’s host, Alex Trebek. … Mr. Friedman added that they were also thinking about whom the human contestants should be and were considering inviting Ken Jennings, the ‘Jeopardy!’ contestant who won 74 consecutive times and collected .52 million in 2004.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

zxjio recommends a pair of articles in The Economist discussing television over broadband, and the effects of DVR use. “Cable-television companies make money by selling packages of channels. The average American household pays 0 a year for over 100 channels of cable television but watches no more than 15. Most would welcome the chance to buy only those channels they want to watch, rather than pay for expensive packages of programming they are largely not interested in. They would prefer greater variety, too — something the internet offers in abundance. A surprising amount of video is available free from websites like Hulu and YouTube, or for a modest fee from iTunes, Netflix Watch Instantly and Amazon Video on Demand. … Consumers’ new-found freedom to choose has struck fear into the hearts of the cable companies. They have been trying to slow internet televisions steady march into the living room by rolling out DOCSIS 3 at a snails pace and then stinging customers for its services. Another favorite trick has been to cap the amount of data that can be downloaded, or to charge extortionately by the megabyte. Yet the measures to suffocate internet television being taken by the cable companies may already be too late. A torrent of innovative start-ups, not seen since the dot-com mania of a decade ago, is flooding the market with technology for supplying internet television to the living room.” And from the second article on DVR usage patterns: “Families with DVRs seem to spend 15-20% of their viewing time watching pre-recorded shows, and skip only about half of all advertisements. This means only about 5% of television is time-shifted and less than 3% of all advertisements are skipped. Mitigating that loss, people with DVRs watch more television. … Early adopters of DVRs used them a lot — not surprisingly, since they paid so much for them. Later adopters use them much less (about two-thirds less, according to a recent study).”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

As a government owned corporation the BBC has a duty to educate, and be evenhanded in its dealings with subjects. Yet in a recent segment on their long-running ‘Film’ program, currently hosted by Jonathon Ross, the BBC ran a biased segment straight from the MPAA. The BBC on the other hand, believes it was fair and balanced.